<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simply-Simpy &#124;&#124; Scott Simpson Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simply-simpy.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simply-simpy.com</link>
	<description>Designed for the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you a Decorator or Designer?</title>
		<link>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/08/30/are-you-a-web-decorator-or-designer/</link>
		<comments>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/08/30/are-you-a-web-decorator-or-designer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simply-simpy.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing I hear a lot while working on the web is: &#8220;I like it! That design looks good&#8221;. Beauty is king. This type of comment implies that the design has met its goals by being pleasant to the eye. While being &#8216;pretty&#8217; is important, does it really matter? What I would really like to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I hear a lot while working on the web is: &#8220;I like it! That design looks good&#8221;. Beauty is king.  This type of comment implies that the design has met its goals by being pleasant to the eye. While being &#8216;pretty&#8217; is important, does it really matter? What I would really like to hear<span id="more-56"></span> is &#8220;I like it! That is an incredibly  easy to use web page! Usability should be considered first, not last when designing and developing a website. Often it seems that &#8216;features&#8217; are more important than making a clear, concise, usable site. </p>
<p><b>Some common usability mistakes:</b></p>
<p>1. <b>Kitchen sink home page</b>. <br />You know the one. The home page that lists EVERYTHING the company has to offer &#8212; the home page should set the tone for the entire site not be a collection of links.</p>
<p>2. <b>Too many top-level navigation items</b>.<br /> The top-level navigation should be no more than 5-7 links for maximum scanability. There are some exceptions to this, Amazon has 13 top-level items for example. But it is safe to say most people are not designing sites as large as Amazon.com.</p>
<p>3. <b>Overly complicated forms</b>. <br />When generating sales leads or sign-up information there is no reason to ask 20 questions of your users. It is better to strike fast and get the lead before a user gets distracted or has second thoughts.</p>
<p>4. <b>Too small of a font size</b>. <br />Generally the body copy should be at least 12px for best readability. 13px is probably better. I see a lot of print designers designing websites with 10 and 11 point font. While this may be desirable for print design &#8212; it can be difficult to read on screen. </p>
<p>Remember, web design without good usability is merely decoration &#8212; and who wants to be a <i>web decorator</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/08/30/are-you-a-web-decorator-or-designer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Easy Fix for IE6 CSS Problems</title>
		<link>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/07/05/an-easy-fix-for-ie6-css-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/07/05/an-easy-fix-for-ie6-css-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simply-simpy.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I began development on this blog, I made the conscious decision not to support Internet Explorer 6. Why you ask? The the answer is simple &#8212; saving time. One less browser for me to test and potentially debug was a no-brainer. Even though I didn&#8217;t want to support IE6, I didn&#8217;t want the site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I began development on this blog, I made the conscious decision not to support Internet Explorer 6. Why you ask? The the answer is simple &#8212; saving time. One less browser for me to test and potentially debug was a no-brainer.   Even though I didn&#8217;t want to support IE6, I didn&#8217;t want the site to look &#8216;broken&#8217;  <span id="more-28"></span>for those users. The solution was to use an IE 6 conditional to <em>only</em> send styles to browsers if they were <em>not</em> IE 6.</p>
<p>The code is as follows:</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><table><tr><td class="line_numbers"><pre>1
2
3
</pre></td><td class="code"><pre class="language" style="font-family:monospace;">&lt;!--[if !IE 6]&gt;&lt;!--&gt;
&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;style.css&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; media=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;
&lt;!--&lt;![endif]--&gt;</pre></td></tr></table></div>

<p>In IE6, it looks like this:<br />
 <a href="http://simply-simpy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ie6.png"><img src="http://simply-simpy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ie6.png" alt="" title="ie6" width="580" height="197" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-52" /></a><br />
Not pretty, but at least the content is readable.</p>
<p>I am sure there are some who think that I should support IE6 &#8212; that every site should fully support  IE6. But to this I say: &#8216;No thanks&#8217;. Continued support of an almost 10 year old browser is a waste of time and money. Most projects are limited by budget, so we should spend our time wisely and continue to move the medium forward.</p>
<p>There is a new internet coming. An internet crafted through <a href="http://www.html5rocks.com/">HTML 5</a> and <a href="http://www.css3.info/">CSS 3</a>.  An internet viewed on tablets and mobile devices &#8212; an internet where even Microsoft will be supporting these new technologies in their upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5494574/internet-explorer-9-a-fresh-start-with-html5">Internet Explorer 9</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simply-simpy.com/2010/07/05/an-easy-fix-for-ie6-css-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
